Thursday, December 13, 2007

Blackface/Yellowface/*face

I'm going to go and see David Hwang's Yellow Face tonight. The reviews are mixed, but the play interests me -- both for itself (among other things, it takes on the question of what happens when a white actor is cast in an Asian role) and for the implications for identity politics.

I have many questions, none of which will be answered by the play itself, but the premise has got me thinking. For starters, I cannot imagine an off-Broadway play that engages with the problems of hiring non-disabled actors to play disabled roles. I can't imagine this as a controversy that would pull the kind of financial backing to put on a production; I don't see it as something that would attract an audience. I mean, other than other crips and our allies, who cares? What do they need to know in order to be able to care?

I mean, for that kind of thing to happen, we'd have to have a large scale awareness of disability culture (and, of course, that presumes an acceptance of the notions that disability is an identity possibility, that there can be disability culture, and that disability art is worthwhile). It would involve a mass change in public consciousness. No longer would disability be read as a marginal pathology that afflicts some, but not, thank god, me; disability would instead be as identifiable a part of contemporary society as issues of gender, race, sexuality, and class. I say "identifiable," as opposed to "accepted," because you can have widespread awareness that an issue exists, even if not many are accepting any of the premises (gay marriage, for example).

Some other things come up. Every year, I read reports of a frat party gone bad -- someone claims free speech as a justification for dressing up in black face and going to the party. Most often, horrible pictures are circulated, there's some outcry, and then coverage disappears. Presumably, these things get worked out locally.

I have mixed feelings about this as a disability thing. On the one hand, I am glad that there is no such disability equivalent. The history and cultural attitudes invoked by blackface are repugnant; I have no wish to be confronted by the disability equivalent. And yet, I feel that, as a culture, we should investigate what it means to dress up as disabled.

Though it might be possible to do so with individual impairments, disability as a whole cannot be reduced to a regularly reproducible set of elements like blackface: artificially blackened skin (to black not brown), the lips, and eyes. No idea what I mean? Won't link to anything, but this Google search will give you some clue. And even if you could decide upon which elements you were going to make into your "disability face," your costume still would not be successful. Despite years of discrimination and oppression and despite a history that is as appalling as the histories of other minoritized groups, there is no performing arts context for disability face. And even though exaggeration of certain physical aspects of certain impairments, there (perhaps fortunately) has not been a systematic reworking of these localized moments into a "tradition." Any attempt at disability face would look like a party costume. And that's kind of the impression I get when I see non-disabled types acting disabled roles.

So, over to you. What would disability face look like? Would you be able to distinguish disability face from disability drag? What would disability drag look like (and here I really do mean *drag,* as opposed to *dress up*). Could PWD with one impairment drag another? Could you drag your own impairment? Or would it have to be non-disabled people dragging disability? When does drag become disability face?

Could there really be a set of performances of disability in which we can separate an actor dressing up as disabled in order to create, with some degree of verisimilitude, a disabled role (because you *know* there are no disabled actors who can do this kind of stuff) from someone in disability face? Would it have to be literally a "face" to be disability face?

BTW: I'm using the phrase "disability face" because there really isn't a word for it. At this point, though, I'd like to offer "spack face" and "spacking up" as possible alternatives.

7 comments:

Raccoon said...

In "Saved," I thought that McCulkin put on a good "face" playing a paraplegic. Not that someone actually in a wheelchair couldn't do better. Watching him going from a lawn into his wheelchair looked believable (I'm a tetraplegic, what do I know), as did him trying to play footsie's at the lunch table.

lilwatchergirl said...

I cannot imagine an off-Broadway play that engages with the problems of hiring non-disabled actors to play disabled roles. I can't imagine this as a controversy that would pull the kind of financial backing to put on a production; I don't see it as something that would attract an audience. I mean, other than other crips and our allies, who cares? What do they need to know in order to be able to care?

You won't believe this, but some off-West End theatres (OK, just the one, maybe - not sure how many more) are actually starting to think about this. The 'fuss' from the disabled community over non-disabled actors playing disabled roles may be starting to have an impact. My g/f goes to see a lot of shows, as she's a theatre director-in-training, and she recently went to an off-West End play which featured an older wheelchair user. The role was played by a recently-disabled man. As my g/f points out, he was an established actor who had become disabled after getting a lot of acting experience, so the stigma of being a 'disabled actor' is reduced by that somewhat. But the theatre still thought about it. And I'm impressed. Over here, you can get quite a lot of controversy from disabled people over the disabled/non-disabled thing with actors. It's *just beginning* to spread to the mainstream, I think - although it's going to take a LOT of time for the controversy to be a general, high-profile thing. We'll see, I guess...

Kay Olson said...

WCD, how would you distinguish disability face from drag from dress up? Is the difference the seriousness vs. the comedic wink-wink aspect? Is it whom does it and the cultural power they have compared to the disabled that they imitate? Is it costume that makes the difference?

You said: disability as a whole cannot be reduced to a regularly reproducible set of elements like blackface

and I'm wondering if maybe a certain kind of use of the wheelchair as a prop might not stand in for the makeup as THE symbol of disability in the way black makeup symbolizes race and blackness and all associated with it. Both are equally inaccurate and incomplete, but maybe the wheelchair IS the disability face in, say, sitcoms where they roll out (pun there) the whole awkwardness thing of main characters embarrassing themselves with un-PCness with the crip character. There is something of a "tradition" there, perhaps, though clearly not as culturally loaded (in ways that the culture as a whole recognizes) as blackface.

Still thinking on your other questions....

Kay Olson said...

Curious what WCD (or aanyone else) thinks of this article (.pdf file): http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/75-3/AFTERMACROKleiman.pdf

Wheelchair Dancer said...

HI Kay!

I am not sure that the prop thing can work in the same way. In the disability community, we often argue that our assistive technologies are parts of our bodies, but there is something more deeply personal about a face. It is the face to which we look in search of consciousness, humanity, and, well, ... connection..

So, I am not sure that a cane or an old hospital wheelchair would do the job.

As for face vs drag. Face, I have no idea about. Drag -- well, still thinking. the article you pass on is provocative, but has some shortcomings... more later.

And thanks for such a challenging thought provoking response.

Veralidaine said...

WD,

These local actors (local for me anyway) might interest you.

http://www.phamaly.org/index-flash.html

-Daine

Ettina said...

It kind of reminds me of before I knew I was autistic, when I would pretend to be autistic. (I was involved in autistic rights before I actually knew I was autistic, I thought I was just BAP.) My mom claimed I was making fun of autistic people, I tried to tell her that I was trying to imitate autistics because I admired them. Anyway, that's my personal association to the distinction between 'black face' and drag.
Also, I do think there are things identified for certain disabilities. Put on sunglasses and wave around a cane and you're blind. Sit in a wheelchair and you're paralyzed. Etc.

Post a Comment